EZB-Vize: Stresstest-Verlierer sollten Kapitalposition verbessern

https://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/banken-versicherungen/belastungscheck-ezb-vize-stresstest-verlierer-sollten-kapitalpolster-verbessern/23426466.html

Luis de Guindos

EZB-Vizepräsident hat die Verlierer des Stresstests unter den Banken aufgefordert, ihre Kapitalpositionen zu verbessern.


(Foto: AP)

FrankfurtEZB-Vizepräsident Luis de Guindos hat die Stresstest-Verlierer unter den Banken aufgefordert, ihre Kapitalpositionen zu verbessern. Diese Geldhäuser sollten robuster werden, um auf kommende Herausforderungen vorbereitet zu sein, sagte der Stellvertreter von Notenbank-Präsident Mario Draghi am Montag in Brüssel laut Redetext. Sie würden genau beobachtet.

Beim europaweiten Fitnesscheck der Bankenbehörde EBA hatten zwölf Institute mit einer Kapitalquote von weniger als neun Prozent abgeschlossen. Die Kapitalposition dieser Banken sei zwar schwach, aber immer noch befriedigend, sagte der Spanier. Bei dem Belastungscheck mussten Banken zeigen, wie robust ihre Kapitalpolster bei einer simulierten schweren Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise sind.

De Guindos zog ein insgesamt positives Fazit. „Zusammengefasst hat die allgemeine Widerstandsfähigkeit der von der EZB überwachten Banken zugenommen verglichen mit dem Stresstest von vor zwei Jahren“, sagte er.

Dem Branchen-Check zufolge sind viele europäische Großbanken stabiler als noch vor ein paar Jahren. Schwachstellen gibt es aber in Großbritannien, Italien und Deutschland. Unter den deutschen Instituten rangierten die NordLB und die Deutsche Bank mit Kapitalquoten von unter neun Prozent im Krisenszenario weit hinten.

Farmers read the news — and the wind — before making crop choices

https://business.financialpost.com/commodities/agriculture/farmers-read-the-news-and-the-wind-before-making-crop-choices

The tableau of a farmer wearing overalls chewing on a stock of wheat is simple and recognizable. “Farmer,” your charade teammates would yell. For the nostalgic, the image harks back to a black-and-white time when all grandpa had to do was get out there, work hard and bring in the harvest.

Advances in agriculture have not outpaced the farmers for which they are intended. There is a constant and justifiable desire among the ag community for improving our operations. Our hands still get dirty. We’re still connected.

Farmers are routinely typecast as lacking when compared to the nuance and sophistication associated with city dwellers. Perhaps it’s because there’s something outwardly simple about what we do — the crops we grow.

A farmer’s decision to grow, say, wheat and soybeans may seem quite simple but, trust me, it’s not. At least not in the classic definition of the word, of constituting a basic element.

CBC ran a story shortly before Canada legalized marijuana with the headline “Why grow food when you can grow weed? Farmers face a difficult choice as legalization looms.”

To wade through the mess of what motivates a farmer to grow what he or she grows and come up with “It’s available, so farmers will feel pressure to plant it” is lazy thinking and damaging. It’s also false.

Cropping decisions are, in part, a farmer’s public expression and they represent so much more than a cold, callous cost-benefit calculation.

New crops and new varieties of old crops enter the market all the time. Marijuana is not special. It’s unique, to be sure, but it is not creating buzz just because it’s a new offering that the Canadian government has labelled an agricultural product.

When edible beans (pulse crops) crossed the ocean and became an option for Canadian farmers, adoption took time. Varieties suited for our climate needed to be developed and farmers needed to become acquainted with how to grow them and how to sell them.

These decisions are not easy. To be an early adopter is risky, and when times are tight — when, say, your neighbour has waged a trade war that has greatly affected commodity prices — farmers tend to grow what they know. And we tend to grow what the area grows.

My area of Manitoba receives more heat units than other parts of the province. We can grow longer-season crops and varieties. But other parts of Manitoba and Canada can grow things we can’t, due to heat, soil and moisture differentials.

To be an early adopter is risky, and when times are tight … farmers tend to grow what they know. And we tend to grow what the area grows

The decision is also social. Where I live, the municipality held a plebiscite asking whether a dispensary should be allowed in the area. The outcome of the vote was an overwhelming “no.” A farmer deciding to take the legal steps required to grow marijuana (and there are many) would also have to be fine with potentially doing something he or she knows is frowned upon in the community.

My decision to grow wheat and soybeans next year will be a public one. If I planted quinoa or did something else perceived as unique or novel on my land, that decision would be fiscal and social. People would talk about it.

Current commodity prices, anticipated commodity prices, weather patterns, the global production outlook and much more are all parts of the complex puzzle of how a farmer decides what to grow.

We’ve got the green light to grow marijuana, kind of. Those licences are not easy to obtain and there’s only a finite amount of them.

Farmers are keenly aware of the option, and may at some point make it part of their operations, but cropping plans are made years in advance and are too complex to give preferential treatment to a newcomer and outlier.

Bell doubles down on Crave with soft rebrand, premium service that includes current HBO content

https://business.financialpost.com/telecom/media/bell-doubles-down-on-crave-with-soft-rebrand-premium-service-that-includes-current-hbo-content

Much like live sports, the ability to watch the latest Game of Thrones episode on the day it’s released keeps avid fans hooked on their television subscriptions.

But BCE Inc.’s media division is eliminating the need for a TV package to watch current HBO content, making it available to stream on a premium version of its rebranded online streaming platform, Crave.

As of Monday, anyone with an internet connection can subscribe to the bulked up version of Crave (formerly known as CraveTV) called Crave+ for an extra $9.99 plus tax per month, getting access to a library that includes new HBO content and hits from The Movie Network (this channel will also be rebranded Crave — across all platforms).

Crave’s upgrade — and its new price points of $9.99 for the basic service and $19.98 for the extras — comes amid major competition from digital giants Netflix Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.

Disruption from these new players has been tough on Canada’s traditional media. The industry is struggling with declining advertising and subscription revenue as viewers, especially younger households, increasingly cut the TV cord and rely on internet streaming for their entertainment needs.

Bell Media’s local competitors have retreated from online streaming, with Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. folding their joint streaming effort, Shomi, two years ago.

Yet Bell is doubling down on Crave. It’s spending millions on content, which is putting pressure on profit margins. In financial results released last week, Bell reported a 2.7 per cent drop in its media division’s adjusted earnings thanks to the ramp up in HBO and Showtime content for Crave.

Bell Media president Randy Lennox said Crave is playing a long game. He believes the video content business is “completely analogous” to the music industry in 2005, when the death knell was ringing for CDs but few recognized the potential of online streaming.

“That business is exponentially growing, it’s in the hundreds of millions of subscribers, and it’s nowhere near a ceiling,” Lennox said in an interview, pointing to players such as Apple and Spotify.

“We are so bent and determined on Crave … we’ve been in it for years now, tweaking it, improving it, evolving it, but sticking with it where others haven’t stuck with it because we do believe we’ll come out with a similar trajectory to that of the music business.”

We are so bent and determined on Crave

Bell Media president Randy Lennox

Bell wants its fair share of the Canadian portion of the hundreds of millions of streaming subscriptions Lennox predicts. Meantime, Lennox recognizes Crave is up against traditional TV products, but doesn’t see the offerings as mutually exclusive. Instead, he said Bell is “on both sides of the highway,” with a responsibility to reach customers through the technology they use.

“Obviously we’re taking a big swing here in the direct-to-consumer business that will sit adjacent to our traditional business,” he said. “We feel responsibility as Canada’s leading media and broadcast company that we have to be a modern, forward-thinking company.”

Besides, Lennox said research suggests HBO’s traditional TV subscriber base in the U.S. didn’t deteriorate when it launched its online streaming platform HBO Go.

“They didn’t rob Peter to pay Paul,” he said.

When it comes to Netflix, Lennox said Crave doesn’t compete so much as it accentuates the service given its different content, which includes HBO, Showtime, Starz, Vice and children’s content. For a modest investment, a consumer can subscribe to both, he said, even though Crave’s premium offering is pricier than Netflix ($10.99 per month) and Amazon Prime Video ($7.99 per month or $79 per year).


Crave’s upgrade comes amid major competition from digital giant Netflix.

Elise Amendola/The Canadian Press/AP

Convergence Research’s Brahm Eiley believes Crave+ has a solid chance of racking up the same proportion of subscribers in Canada as HBO Go has in the U.S., where he estimates the number of subscribers at 8 million. He thinks $20 is a decent price for a bulked up offer, especially since there are fewer online streaming options in Canada than in the U.S.

“For sure there’s pent up demand,” Eiley said. “But is this a Netflix killer, is this going to keep Netflix from growing? No.”

Still, he said Bell is dealing with the reality that viewership is shifting online. It’s been “extremely good at locking down a lot of these big programmers and basically being their arm here in Canada,” he said.

Solutions Research Group president Kaan Yigit is less optimistic on uptake of the premium product.

“It’s a tough price point because it’s roughly two times Netflix pricing which is the benchmark for value in the consumers mind,” Yigit said.

But he agreed it will appeal to HBO fanatics and said it could reignite some growth for the service.

“Crave has been stuck on neutral for some time and has been easily eclipsed by Amazon Prime Video, which is pulling in good numbers of streamers,” he said. “How successful it becomes will be a function of how HBO does in the next two to three years.”

• Email: ejackson@nationalpost.com | Twitter:

Three scenarios: How the U.S. midterms are likely to affect investors

https://business.financialpost.com/investing/how-the-us-midterms-are-likely-to-affect-investors

In the aftermath of the most devastating month for stock markets in seven years, U.S. voters are heading to the polls Tuesday for the midterm elections that may play a significant role in deciding where equities go next.

Historically, voters have had little interest in midterm elections. In 2014, less than one-third turned out to boost the Republican Party’s majority in the House of Representatives and see them win back the Senate for the first time since 2006.

The added interest in this year’s election, CITI Research North America economist Dana Peterson said, is due to how much is riding on them for U.S. President Donald Trump, whose fellow Republicans currently control both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

“Usually, no one pays attention to them but they are this year because it’s going to act as a referendum on President Trump’s policies,” Peterson said.

Despite the low turnout, midterm elections tend to have a direct impact on Wall Street, with the uncertainty depressing markets in the runup and then, a post-election rally regardless of which side emerges victorious.

According to Kevin McCreadie, president and chief investment officer of AGF Investments Inc., the market has not declined in the 12 months following a midterm election since 1946. The average boost, post midterm, he said, was 15.3 per cent.

But with more at stake this year, especially when it comes to economic policy, that all could change.

Scenario 1: Democrats win the House; Republicans keep the Senate

Multiple polls point to the most likely outcome being a split of Congress. The Democrats are widely expected to gain control of the House while the Republicans are the clear favourites to maintain their majority in the Senate — and perhaps even increase their strength there.

The split is so expected that Wall Street has already priced it in as the most likely result, said Hugh Johnson, chief investment officer at Hugh Johnson Advisors, a New York-based firm. If it happens, he said, it will most likely be met with a yawn.

In this scenario, the markets may undergo their usual post-election rally, but the divide in Congress may lead to policy “gridlock” in the coming months — not necessarily a bad thing for investors.

“For Wall Street, less is more and if you’re talking about virtually nothing coming out of Washington, that’s less and might be pretty good news,” he said.

Seeing the two parties work together through the next two years of Trump’s term would be rare, but there are a few policy issues that could offer the rivals a chance to do so. Trump is widely expected to work with the Democrats in the House on a new infrastructure bill projected to be in the range of US$1 trillion to US$1.5 trillion. Former White House economic advisor Gary Cohn told Reuters in September that he expects it to be the first thing the two sides work on post-election. CITI, Peterson said, already has the deal “baked in” to GDP growth projections — she expects the deal will add 0.2 per cent in 2020, allowing growth to reach 1.8 per cent.

A new infrastructure bill projected to be in the range of US$1 trillion to US$1.5 trillion could be the first thing Trump works on with the Democrats

McCreadie expects the markets to bounce in November and December, but uncertainty can creep back into investors’ minds as soon as January when the new House sits for the first time.

That’s when the whispers about Democrats potentially moving to impeach Trump could begin. Party leaders have been silent on the possibility on the campaign trail, focusing instead on investigating the president in connection with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Under a split Congress scenario, it’s unlikely impeachment would result in a conviction in the Senate because it would require two-thirds of the Republican-dominated chamber to vote in favour. Even if the process goes nowhere, McCreadie said the markets will become volatile due to headline risk.

“(The market) will be noisy but not corrective — unless something shows up in that stuff that says they’ve got him,” he said.

Scenario 2: Democrats sweep Congress

Polling website FiveThirtyEight was projecting on Friday afternoon that the Democrats have a 15 per cent chance of winning a majority in the Senate. In fact, they’re widely expected to lose a seat and inflate the Republican advantage in the chamber to 52-48. But if the Democrats pull off the unexpected, they could have a clear path to impeaching Trump.

While going down that road would set off all kinds of market fireworks, it comes with all kinds of political risks for the Democrats as well.

Assuming they don’t move to impeach, gridlock may once again be the order of the day, Johnson suggested, because Trump will be able to wield his veto power on Democratic legislation.

“Nothing is going to happen because it’ll hit a wall when it gets to the White House,” Johnson said.

A few exceptions would be an infrastructure bill and perhaps some kind of co-operation with Trump to resolve the China trade war. The Democrats would also be able to successfully put an end to any hopes the Republicans may have had about repealing Obamacare.

The fear in the market is that the tax reform and pro-business agenda is stopped — and not only stops but gets rolled back

Kevin McCreadie, president and CIO, AGF Investments

Attempts to challenge or repeal any of Trump’s economic initiatives — such as the US$1.5 trillion in tax cuts announced last year or new measures to tackle the debt — could be worrisome for investors, McCreadie said.

“The fear in the market is that the tax reform and pro-business agenda is stopped — and not only stops but gets rolled back.”

A sell-off in equities would soon follow. McCreadie said bonds would then become positive as investors make a move to fixed income instead.

Scenario 3:  Republicans sweep Congress

Should the Republicans maintain complete control of Congress, “whatever Trump wants, Trump will get,” Johnson said.

Under this scenario, there will be no impeachment and Obamacare is once again at risk.

Trump has also flirted with additional cuts and strangely suggested two weeks ago that he was looking into a 10 per cent tax cut for the middle class. The GOP has since walked back that suggestion.

The tax cuts that Trump made in 2017 will not be rolled back and Congress will instead look for a way to make individual cuts permanent as they’re set to expire in 2025, Peterson said.

… from the point of view of markets and the economy, we have our best chance — I hate to say this — that the Republicans retain the House and the Senate. That’s the best outcome

Hugh Johnson, CIO, Hugh Johnson Advisors

“If you do that, there’s no benefit to the economy in the short run,” Peterson said. “You’re not going to see it until 2026 and in the meanwhile you’d signal that you’re going to run up budget deficits even more than we’re anticipating.”

The tax cuts were mostly responsible for the ballooning budget deficit in 2018, which increased 17 per cent to a six-year high of US$779 billion. Further debt increases, Peterson said, could lead to the U.S. running a risk of a downgrade of sovereign debt.

In the long term, continued stimulus will lead to the Fed continuing to increase interest rates so that Trump does not overheat the economy. “They’ll have to go it alone under these conditions and you bet they will,” said Johnson, who added that rising rates could eventually derail the bull market.

The short term offers more intriguing possibilities for investors. With Trump’s pro-business agenda unimpeded, the equities markets may heat up in the next two years, Johnson said.

“As hard as it is for me to say, from the point of view of markets and the economy, you probably have to say we have our best chance — I hate to say this — that the Republicans retain the House and the Senate,” Johnson said. “That’s the best outcome.”

• Email: vferreira@postmedia.com | Twitter:

China Has More $1 Billion Unicorns Than the US

https://www.moneymakers.com/china-has-more-1-billion-unicorns-than-the-us/



The latest Hurun Report from China on Friday revealed the number of Chinese startups worth $1 billion has overtaken the number of US startups worth the same amount.

China has added 34 “unicorns” in Q3 of 2018, taking China’s total to 181 compared to 138 in the US, according to the South China Morning Post. The country’s 181 thriving new enterprises are worth a combined 4.8 trillion yuan, the equivalent to $696 billion.

Rupert Hoogewer, chief researcher of the Hurun report said of China’s startups:

“These unicorns, mostly in the new economy, are the fastest-growing companies with the most potential to grow big against a slowing economy.”

Despite this, China’s overall growth is slowing, Q3 saw its slowest quarterly growth as a country since the economic crisis which began a decade ago. Its stock markets have also tumbled with the Shenzhen and Shanghai declining over 25% this year alone.

Many of these “unicorn” companies in the US and China are technology startups, with China’s new companies innovating in anything from fintech to e-commerce and artificial intelligence.

China’s determined technology focus has been rewarded with much early investment capital sourced both nationally and internationally. More specifically, 45 of China’s unicorns are internet services related businesses and 21 are in internet finance.

That said, China’s peer-to-peer lending business, much of it internet based, is under severe regulatory pressure and has declined rapidly over the last 12 months.

15 of China’s billion-dollar startups surpassed their $1-billion thresholds within three years of their creation.

The latest Hurun list doesn’t include the 20 Chinese companies that have become publicly listed already and 2018, and three which had merged.

China’s Biggest Unicorns

Billionaires in China, Jack Ma

Jack Ma, image from Forbes

China’s largest unicorn is, no surprise, Ant Financial an affiliate to Alibaba and the world’s most valuable unicorn with a valuation surpassing $150 billion and 1 trillion yuan. Alibaba and Ant Financial founder Jack Ma, at 54, is China’s richest man with a net worth of $39 billion.

Ma founded Ant Financial, which rebranded from Alipay in 2014. In 2017 Ant Financial handled more payments than Mastercard and its online payments platform completed more than $8 trillion worth of transactions.

It controls the world’s largest money-market fund, has made loans to tens of millions of people and is now the world’s biggest fintech firm.

The second-largest Chinese startup is Jinri Toutiao, a news aggregation application owned by Bytedance Technology and with a value of over $75 billion or around 500 billion Chinese yuan.

US Unicorns

The US figure of 138 billion-dollar startups is taken from CB Insights and Pitchbook data from August 2018. A recent analysis of 91 U.S unicorns found over half had been founded by modern-day American immigrants.

Uber is the most valuable U.S unicorn at $72 billion, followed by Elon Musk’s Tesla at $21 billion. If Uber decides to go public it could achieve an IPO valuation of $120 billion.

Featured image from Alibaba.